Australia's national breast screening program 18 years on: time for a new direction?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mammographic screening for breast cancer has been almost universally accepted as reducing mortality in the screened population through early detection. National breast screening services are now well established in many countries, including Australia, where BreastScreen was established in 1991. Since then BreastScreen has provided a high-quality service to Australian women. A major evaluation of the BreastScreen Program is underway, commissioned by the Australian Health Minister's Advisory Council. 1 This is an opportunity to reflect on the role of BreastScreen in the provision of breast care in Australia, to establish new and innovative directions, and to ensure the future relevance of the program. This article discusses the issues from the viewpoint of clinicians at the coalface, who are providing breast screening and treatment services, but who appear to be under-represented in the review process. Recent discussion in the international literature about the information provided to women attending breast screening programs further highlights issues with the process of breast cancer screening. 2 The BreastScreen Australia National Accreditation Standards, against which individual services are evaluated, were set when the program was established and were updated in 2004. 3 Individual services across Australia structure their programs quite differently while striving for these same standards. There is a lack of uniformity in many aspects of service provision, such as structure of the administration , quality assurance procedures, approach to women with a family history of breast cancer, use of clinical staff, data collection procedures, forms used and the approach to issuing results. Many of these processes could be standardized, and successful ideas from one service implemented across others. BreastScreen Australia aims for a participation rate of 70% of the target population (women aged 50–69); the current national participation rate is only around 52%. 1 While there are a number of variables affecting participation rates, one of the key factors may be that this figure reflects participation in the BreastScreen, but this may not reflect participation in mammography screening in general. An unknown (and probably very significant) number of women have screening outside BreastScreen, and this 'de facto' screening is not monitored, partly because there is no Medicare rebate for screening mammography. Medicare paid rebates for 314,000 bilateral mammograms and 40,000 unilateral mammograms. 4 Many of these private 'diagnostic' mammograms (eligible for a rebate) in women with a family history, past breast cancer or nodularity/mastalgia may be performed with screening intent. In addition, it is likely …
منابع مشابه
Health education models application by peer group for improving breast cancer screening among Iranian women with a family history of breast cancer: A randomized control trial
Background: Studies have shown that participation of Iranian women with family history of breast cancer in screening service is low. This investigation has evaluated the effectiveness of health models according to peer group in improving clinical breast exam (CBE) among Iranian women with a family history of breast cancer. Methods: This was a randomized control ...
متن کاملParticipation Rate, Family Histories, Symptoms, and Incidence of Breast Cancer in the Screening Program for Breast Cancer in the Population Covered by Arak Health Centers
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. The present study aimed to assess the incidence, family histories, and symptoms of breast cancer among the 30–70-year-old women under the coverage of the health centers of Arak city, as well as evaluating the rate of participation in breast cancer screening. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted during 2016-2019 ...
متن کاملAppendix. Methodology for Estimating the Effect of Health Reform on Women’s Insurance Coverage and Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
This technical appendix provides additional details about our methodology for estimating the number of people who are uninsured in 2014 after the implementation of health insurance expansions under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) and for estimating 2014 eligibility for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detecti...
متن کاملجهش های ژنتیکی جدید در ژن های اصلی سرطان پستان (BRCA1/BRCA2) در زنان ایرانی مبتلا به سرطان پستان زودرس
Background: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy and the main cause of death in mid-aged women. Genetic germ line mutations in BRCAI/BRCA2 in Iranian women with breast or ovarian cancer have not been yet reported. Materials and methods: Clinical data, family history and blood samples were obtained from 83 females aged less than 45 years with primary breast cancer in order to su...
متن کاملDoes screening mammography lead to overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer?
www.aafp.org/afp Volume 87, Number 6 ◆ March 15, 2013 What does this article say? Jill: This is a prospective historical cohort study looking at the rate of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer between 1986 and 2005 in 39,888 Norwegian women 50 to 69 years of age. Norway piloted mammographic screening in four counties that represented 40 percent of the eligible population in 1996 before impl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- ANZ journal of surgery
دوره 79 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009